From Colonies to Confirmed Plasmids: A Workflow Many of Us Know Too Well
If you’ve ever screened clones, you know the loop.
You pick colonies. You send them for sequencing. The data finally comes back and a few ambiguous base calls within the sequence mean you can't confidently move forward. Now you're back at the bench, submitting new samples and waiting all over again.
For anyone working with plasmids and cloning or verifying constructs, this bottleneck costs you days you don’t have. Traditionally, clone screening, construct verification, and plasmid prep have meant multiple vendors and too much idle time between steps.
Here’s how GENEWIZ helps remove much of that friction.
Step 1: Choose where you're starting
The biggest time sink in a traditional workflow is the miniprep. Before you can even submit for sequencing, you're spending 1-2 days growing cultures and extracting purified DNA for every clone you want to screen.
Colony-EZ, a direct colony-to-whole-plasmid sequencing workflow, skips this entirely. You submit bacterial colonies directly, and whole plasmid sequencing data comes back overnight before 8am for US customers and as fast as 1 business day from sample receipt in our Leipzig lab for European customers. That means go/no‑go decisions can often be made before you’d even finish a miniprep in a traditional workflow.
If you already have purified plasmid DNA on hand, Plasmid-EZ gives you the same whole plasmid sequence, useful when you're verifying a construct you've already prepped for another purpose.
Colony-EZ and Plasmid-EZ utilize Nanopore sequencing to read complete plasmid molecules end-to-end, enabling rapid and comprehensive construct verification in a single workflow.
Step 2: Add targeted validation where needed
Whole plasmid sequencing provides confident coverage across most constructs, but certain regions within the sequence can still be challenging. Long homopolymeric stretches, direct repeats, and other repeat-rich regions are more prone to low-confidence base calls and small insertion or deletion errors. Heterogenous or mixed samples may also provide incorrect interpretation. In addition, certain motifs, such as Dcm methylation sites may produce ambiguous base calls or deletions.
For those cases, pairing whole plasmid data with targeted Sanger sequencing on the specific region of concern gives you two independent validations before you commit to scale-up. Custom primer synthesis through GENEWIZ Oligo services means you don't have to source that separately.
Step 3: Move directly into scale-up
Once you’ve identified a confirmed clone, many workflows require switching to a new vendor for plasmid preparation, often restarting the process and re-entering sample information. GENEWIZ simplifies this step through its integrated ordering platform, which connects sequencing directly to downstream plasmid prep and scale-up services. This continuity keeps your workflow streamlined, reduces manual data entry, and makes sample tracking easier from start to finish.
For researchers running on tight timelines, removing that vendor handoff can shave days off a production schedule.
Turnaround Time Comparison: In-house vs Integrated Workflow
When validating plasmid constructs, workflow design has a direct impact on turnaround time. The table below compares a traditional in-house approach with GENEWIZ integrated Colony-to-prep workflow.
| Step | In-house Workflow (Sequencing and scale up) | GENEWIZ Integrated Workflow (Colony-EZ → Plasmid Prep scale up) |
| Sample preparation | Miniprep required: 1 day | No prep required: 0 days |
| Screening & sequencing | Whole plasmid sequencing + Sanger: 1 day | Whole plasmid sequencing + Sanger: 1 day |
| Rescreening (if needed) | 1 day (requires resubmission of samples) | 0.5 days (no resubmission—samples already with GENEWIZ) |
| Positive clone scale-up | 2–3 days | 2–3 days |
| Total turnaround time | 5–6 days | 3.5–5 days |
How to pick which workflow is right for you:
Q: When should I consider using a colony-to-prep integrated workflow (GENEWIZ Colony-EZ to plasmid prep)?
A: Consider an integrated workflow if you are doing high-throughput screening or sequencing large numbers of colonies. Instead of performing minipreps for every clone, you can use Colony-EZ first, then scale up only the selected positive clones. The main advantage is that it streamlines coordination and reduces turnaround time by eliminating handoffs between service providers and enabling parallel steps. This helps save time and reduces costs.
Q: Does this workflow reduce plasmid prep scale-up time?
A: Not directly. Turnaround time for plasmid prep scale-up depends on the scale and desired yield. The time savings comes from accelerating the earlier screening and sequencing steps.
Q: Should I always consider Sanger validation?
A: Sanger validation is recommended if your plasmids contain direct repeats or long homopolymeric sequences, especially repeats longer than 8 bases. With GENEWIZ, Sanger validation can be submitted in parallel with a Plasmid-EZ order or after reviewing the Plasmid-EZ results.
Daily Insight
Recent Posts
Recent Post Tags
- next generation sequencing
- gene synthesis
- rna sequencing
- transcriptomics
- sanger sequencing
- proteomics
- Event
- GENEWIZ Update
- aav-itr
- cell and gene therapy
- itr sequencing
- mRNA
- olink
- aav plasmid prep
- antibody discovery
- genomics
- grant winner
- quantitative pcr (qPCR)
- rna therapeutics
- single-cell sequencing
- whole plasmid sequencing
- PacBio
- aav
- bioengineering
- circular rna (circRNA)
- digital pcr (dPCR)
- direct colony sequencing
- immunity
- lentivirus
- long-read sequencing
- oxford nanopore sequencing (ont)
- pcr + sanger sequencing
- peptides
- whole genome sequencing